Danbooru

Feather Implications

Posted under Tags

BUR #9679 has been approved by @evazion.

create implication white_feathers -> feathers
create implication black_feathers -> feathers
create implication blue_feathers -> feathers
create implication red_feathers -> feathers
create implication pink_feathers -> feathers
create implication brown_feathers -> feathers
create implication green_feathers -> feathers
create implication yellow_feathers -> feathers
create implication purple_feathers -> feathers

For some reason, none of the colour_feathers tags imply the main feathers tag and I couldn't find a single discussion about it.

Also, I made quick wikis for the ones that lacked it (couldn't submit this BUR otherwise) but I'm unsure if they are adequate.

Updated

Unbreakable said:

For some reason, none of the colour_feathers tags imply the main feathers tag and I couldn't find a single discussion about it.

Also, I made quick wikis for the ones that lacked it (couldn't submit this BUR otherwise) but I'm unsure if they are adequate.

The wikis you made go along with what was written in the others and add an info that may sound obvious to many, but it's not hard to imagine it being tagged for wings just as colored_sleeves is tagged on clothes with sleeves attached sometimes.

Edit: Idk how you interpreted it, but I meant your wikis were correct, because people tagging it the way I said is not an unlikely scenario, even if we already have better tags for the job.

Updated

Hyozen said:

The wikis you made go along with what was written in the others and add an info that may sound obvious to many, but it's not hard to imagine it being tagged for wings just as colored_sleeves is tagged on clothes with sleeves attached sometimes.

Well unlike sleeves we already have colour_wings + feathered wings for that.

Hyozen said:

A rename wouldn't work anyway, because the tag has more than 200 posts, to rename it we would need to alias first and then unalias. But I think an alias on the other way around without unaliasing later would be better for findability.

Don't forget that we also have bird tail for a similar (same?) concept.

magcolo said:

BUR #9684 has been rejected.

create implication grey_feathers -> feathers
create implication orange_feathers -> feathers
create implication peacock_feathers -> feathers
create implication falling_feathers -> feathers
create implication glowing_feather -> feathers
create implication hat_feather -> feathers
create implication feather_hair -> feathers

I would consider a separate BUR for feather hair. One might argue that the feathers aren't always notable.

1 2