Danbooru

I don't know what can/can't upload,

Posted under General

I'm trying my best to upload art that has high quality, avoid all kinds of AI-art, taking note of criticism

  • Bad limbs
  • bad coloring/shading
  • obstructing watermarks
  • etc.

Some art only gets approved if it's from notable websites.
Pixiv gets higher priority than Twitter,
which in turn, gets higher priority than other sites.

If duplicated art get uploaded The newer art becomes the parent, even though they're pixel-perfect_duplicate
and arranged in a way that the 1st post was looks like it uploaded 2nd.

A user who has uploaded all related art in the whole set gets, approved for each one,
but when someone else uploads the newest addition to that same set, it gets rejected if it looks bad.

Hole18 said:

Some art only gets approved if it's from notable websites.
Pixiv gets higher priority than Twitter,
which in turn, gets higher priority than other sites.

None of this is true. As long as the post's source is a first-party source then they're all equally valid.

Hole18 said:

If duplicated art get uploaded The newer art becomes the parent, even though they're pixel-perfect_duplicate
and arranged in a way that the 1st post was looks like it uploaded 2nd.

The opposite is true. If a duplicate is uploaded after the original post, then it should be the child of the original.

Hole18 said:

A user who has uploaded all related art in the whole set gets, approved for each one,
but when someone else uploads the newest addition to that same set, it gets rejected if it looks bad.

Not all the same approvers will be checking pending posts at different points in time. If there's no difference in quality between each image in the set, it's likely the original approver just didn't see the new posts.

Hole18 said:

The 2nd one keeps happening for some reason, even when I make corrections, it's just adjusted right back.

Some users on the site are overly competitive and will try to set their uploads as the parent even when they shouldn't be. I recommend messaging users that keep switching parents like this and, if they seem uncooperative, then message a mod to help resolve the situation.

The only instances I see are on post #5829409 where you tagged it duplicate even though the images look quite a bit different, and post #5835204 where the parent is a pixiv version (100 JPEG quality vs 85 on the twitter version). In neither case your "corrections" were actually right. "Duplicate" only applies in cases where the images are either exactly identical or inferior. A higher-quality version doesn't count as "duplicate".

FWIW, I don't tag duplicate on inferior images if they were uploaded first, but they should still be the child of the superior version.

Hole18 said:

If duplicated art get uploaded The newer art becomes the parent, even though they're pixel-perfect_duplicate
and arranged in a way that the 1st post was looks like it uploaded 2nd.

Hole18 said:

The 2nd one keeps happening for some reason, even when I make corrections, it's just adjusted right back.

Pixel-perfect_duplicates get set as the child of the original image. This is also true for duplicates that have a lower quality as the newer image. Most of the time you can tell that an image has a lower quality by the filesize or by the resolution. The image with the best quality should always be the parent.

1