create implication clothed_sex -> sex
Fairly obvious.
It isn't always easy to tag clothed_sex vs. sexually_suggestive, but if it can be tagged, then it's pretty straightforward that it should imply the sex tag.
Posted under Tags
create implication clothed_sex -> sex
Fairly obvious.
It isn't always easy to tag clothed_sex vs. sexually_suggestive, but if it can be tagged, then it's pretty straightforward that it should imply the sex tag.
Not all of the posts under clothed_sex are of intercourse. post #1704089 for example is paizuri. post #1630845 is fellatio.
Toks said:
Not all of the posts under clothed_sex are of intercourse. post #1704089 for example is paizuri. post #1630845 is fellatio.
Whoops, I should've thought my attempt at implication through. However, couldn't there be separate tags for those kinds of things? Would it be of any use to have "clothed_paizuri" or such instead, or would that just be more clutter if "clothed_sex paizuri" covers the same thing?
Seems more practical to me to have just one tag so it's easier to search. I don't think I'd want to search for ~clothed_sex ~clothed_paizuri ~clothed_fellatio ~clothed_cunnilingus ~clothed_handjob ~clothed_fingering ~clothed_buttjob ~clothed_thigh_sex ~clothed_thighhigh_sex to get the results I want (yes, those are all things currently under the clothed_sex tag, so that's not a theoretical example).
Toks said:
Seems more practical to me to have just one tag so it's easier to search. I don't think I'd want to search for ~clothed_sex ~clothed_paizuri ~clothed_fellatio ~clothed_cunnilingus ~clothed_handjob ~clothed_fingering ~clothed_buttjob ~clothed_thigh_sex ~clothed_thighhigh_sex to get the results I want (yes, those are all things currently under the clothed_sex tag, so that's not a theoretical example).
Makes sense to me. Sorry for the ill-thought-out topic then, I should've given it more consideration.