Tag implication: tentacle_hair -> inkling

create implication tentacle_hair -> inkling

Link to implication

inklings have tentacles for hair, and should be tagged as such.

I think you mean

inkling -> tentacle_hair

Also, there's always the possibility someone will draw an inkling with human hair instead of tentacles.

You do have a point.

We do have at least one case where I really would hesitate to call her hair tentacles

not to mention the possibility that character might cosplay as an inkling without necessarily having all of the features

-1

Implicating design features to characters is a bad idea.

The tag implication tentacle_hair -> inkling has been rejected.