lowleg, lowleg_bikini and lowleg_panties

Posts Name
----- --------------
1127 lowleg
90 lowleg_bikini
870 lowleg_panties

someone should make the call to merge these.

Right now the latter two implicate to lowleg.

lowleg_bikini (90) lowleg (1127)
lowleg_panties (870) lowleg (1127)

I don't know if these should really be merged, so much as the "missing" 167 lowleg posts get classified as panties or bikini, unless there's some third type I cant think of.

I've fixed these. There were a few lowleg jeans and other pants as well so I added a lowleg_pants tag. Right now there are only eight posts in it, so I don't know if you want to alias it to lowleg just for consistancy or not.

Well, implicate, yes. There aren't very many but for the sake of consistency, I'll add it. I imagine pants, bikini and panties covers every remotely realistic possibility.

See forum #5966.

The reason I suggested using lowleg rather than the appended tags was because it made more sense to me. If you want to find lowleg panties, you'd search both tags separately. Because you see much more than lowleg panties or bikinis, I suggested just using lowleg as the tag used for such an act (something being just short of clitslip)

My opinion still stands; there should just be a lowleg tag and that's it. If people want to search for a specific style of lowleg, they can add that tag into their search query.

Well, while I share that type of sentiment in many cases, and it does make sense, lowleg_panties is a very well established tag and I'm not inclined to go deleting it or the others now. The three we have cover pretty everything, and they implicate back to their base clothing type anyway, so it's the same thing in the end. I'm just going to leave it as is.

With the implication in place, I guess I don't see a problem with it. It makes it easier to search more specific styles as well as searching the base style for those who want to find anything in that style.