create implication hair_tie_in_mouth -> hair_tie

BUR #3664 has been rejected.

create implication hair_tie_in_mouth -> hair_tie

"If one has a hair tie in their mouth, one must assume there is a hair tie."
-Shakespearicles (probably)

EDIT: The bulk update request #3664 (forum #174220) has been rejected by @Hillside_Moose.

Counterargument: hair_tie_in_mouth scrunchie. "scrunchie_in_mouth" is aliased to it.

For reference: topic #15294

Oh jeez, I didn't know there had already been an in-depth discussion about this conundrum, lol. Never mind, then!

The bulk update request #3664 (forum #174220) has been rejected by @Hillside_Moose.