[SPOILER] Ranni the Witch implication

The bulk update request #9347 has been approved by @evazion.

create implication miniature_ranni -> ranni_the_witch

Isn't this a spoiler, the same way how almost every single post where Ranni is wearing the ring that the Tarnished gave to her is marked with spoilers?
I kind of agree and kind of disagree with the implication.
When I'm looking for art of ranni_the_witch, I'm only interested in her "large" doll form, not the small one. They may be the same person, but it's two fairly different bodies (only size wise). I personally don't know any similar examples, so currently it's hard to judge.
Edit:
The only example I can think of is ainz_ooal_gown and his "alter-ego" Momon, who doesn't doesn't have a tag on danbooru. It's basically a "good" version of Ainz, that is always in armor, yet all posts with Momon get tagged with ainz_ooal_gown.

What about a minigirl search?

MiiaBestLamia said:

Isn't this a spoiler, the same way how almost every single post where Ranni is wearing the ring that the Tarnished gave to her is marked with spoilers?
I kind of agree and kind of disagree with the implication.

Every image will basically be tagged with the miniature version and the original version. An, kind of, inofficial implication will be given by the taggers anyway. Plus: The thing with spoilers is basically as evazion said once. You kind of have to search for the spoiler, without really knowing it by simply looking at the tag or the image itself.
Otherwise we have to think about removing the tag at all (and every other tag that is a spoiler in itself), because then the whole existence of the tag is a spoiler in some kind. We are an image based website, not a wiki, so we shouldn't be to pedantic about any spoilers.

MiiaBestLamia said:

The only example I can think of is ainz_ooal_gown and his "alter-ego" Momon, who doesn't doesn't have a tag on danbooru. It's basically a "good" version of Ainz, that is always in armor, yet all posts with Momon get tagged with ainz_ooal_gown.

All images of Momon should be tagged Ainz Ooal Gown and Momon. The tag has to be created simply.

Hillside_Moose said:

What about a minigirl search?

There is a reason for the tag.

MiiaBestLamia said:

Isn't this a spoiler, the same way how almost every single post where Ranni is wearing the ring that the Tarnished gave to her is marked with spoilers?
I kind of agree and kind of disagree with the implication.
When I'm looking for art of ranni_the_witch, I'm only interested in her "large" doll form, not the small one. They may be the same person, but it's two fairly different bodies (only size wise). I personally don't know any similar examples, so currently it's hard to judge.

It's literally just an identical, smaller version of the character. If this implication is a spoiler then miniature ranni itself is a spoiler, and should be tagged spoilers, implication or no.

Without the context for the existence of the doll it won't affect how someone enjoys the story. It's a very minor spoiler.

MiiaBestLamia said:

The only example I can think of is ainz_ooal_gown and his "alter-ego" Momon, who doesn't doesn't have a tag on danbooru. It's basically a "good" version of Ainz, that is always in armor, yet all posts with Momon get tagged with ainz_ooal_gown.

A tag should be made, I can go ahead and create a tag and wiki for that and tag every applicable post. Not sure whether I call it Momon (Overlord) or Ainz Ooal Gown (Momon) though.

Laudividni said:

A tag should be made, I can go ahead and create a tag and wiki for that and tag every applicable post. Not sure whether I call it Momon (Overlord) or Ainz Ooal Gown (Momon) though.

I think it should be called Momon (overlord).

I really don't see this as a "real" spoiler unless you make it a spoiler. In fact, the Miniature Ranni wiki has a spoilered description that has no bearing on tagging and only serves to offer a minor story event spoiler that has no real purpose being there.
Marking it as a spoiler makes it more of a spoiler than if you had said nothing.

I'm skeptical enough that it should even be a character tag due to minigirl, as Moose said, but if we're insistent on it staying a character tag, it should be implicated because... yeah it's the minigirl version of the exact same character.

The bulk update request #9347 (forum #207987) has been approved by @evazion.

I've removed the spoilers tag from the default blacklist. It's frustrating for regular users to have posts randomly hidden because of trivial spoilers from franchises they don't care about. Calling every trivial thing like this a spoiler completely devalued the meaning of the tag.