Feather Implications

BUR #9679 has been approved by @evazion.

create implication white_feathers -> feathers
create implication black_feathers -> feathers
create implication blue_feathers -> feathers
create implication red_feathers -> feathers
create implication pink_feathers -> feathers
create implication brown_feathers -> feathers
create implication green_feathers -> feathers
create implication yellow_feathers -> feathers
create implication purple_feathers -> feathers

For some reason, none of the colour_feathers tags imply the main feathers tag and I couldn't find a single discussion about it.

Also, I made quick wikis for the ones that lacked it (couldn't submit this BUR otherwise) but I'm unsure if they are adequate.

Unbreakable said:

For some reason, none of the colour_feathers tags imply the main feathers tag and I couldn't find a single discussion about it.

Also, I made quick wikis for the ones that lacked it (couldn't submit this BUR otherwise) but I'm unsure if they are adequate.

The wikis you made go along with what was written in the others and add an info that may sound obvious to many, but it's not hard to imagine it being tagged for wings just as colored_sleeves is tagged on clothes with sleeves attached sometimes.

Edit: Idk how you interpreted it, but I meant your wikis were correct, because people tagging it the way I said is not an unlikely scenario, even if we already have better tags for the job.

Hyozen said:

The wikis you made go along with what was written in the others and add an info that may sound obvious to many, but it's not hard to imagine it being tagged for wings just as colored_sleeves is tagged on clothes with sleeves attached sometimes.

Well unlike sleeves we already have colour_wings + feathered wings for that.

BUR #9684 has been rejected.

create implication grey_feathers -> feathers
create implication orange_feathers -> feathers
create implication peacock_feathers -> feathers
create implication falling_feathers -> feathers
create implication glowing_feather -> feathers
create implication hat_feather -> feathers
create implication feather_hair -> feathers

you forgot one

added some other ones

Unbreakable said:

Well unlike sleeves we already have colour_wings + feathered wings for that.

As much as I agree, the tags seems to be filled with wings, which would require quite some gardening.

magcolo said:

BUR #9684 has been rejected.

create implication grey_feathers -> feathers
create implication orange_feathers -> feathers
create implication peacock_feathers -> feathers
create implication falling_feathers -> feathers
create implication glowing_feather -> feathers
create implication hat_feather -> feathers
create implication feather_hair -> feathers

you forgot one

Not really, I only did the ones with more than 100 posts.

Unbreakable said:

Not really, I only did the ones with more than 100 posts.

Grey feathers was missing on feathers' wiki page, so you probably missed it, either way it deserves the implication

Should we rename tail feathers -> feathered tail? like how feathered wings works

Found this lime green feather, which is only has takagaki kaede arts (lime_green_feather -takagaki_kaede), is it useful?

edit: looks like it's one of kaede's outfit, should make it a character tag then

magcolo said:

Grey feathers was missing on feathers' wiki page, so you probably missed it

No, I did a search.

Unbreakable said:

No, I did a search.

makes sense
It seems like a bunch of other feather tags aren't implied to feathers either

magcolo said:

Should we rename tail feathers -> feathered tail? like how feathered wings works

A rename wouldn't work anyway, because the tag has more than 200 posts, to rename it we would need to alias first and then unalias. But I think an alias on the other way around without unaliasing later would be better for findability.

Hyozen said:

A rename wouldn't work anyway, because the tag has more than 200 posts, to rename it we would need to alias first and then unalias. But I think an alias on the other way around without unaliasing later would be better for findability.

Don't forget that we also have bird tail for a similar (same?) concept.

tail feathers was not aliased to bird tail because of posts like post #2021896, but obviously nobody cares and people are just gonna use both without a thought.

This bulk update request is pending automatic rejection in 5 days.

magcolo said:

BUR #9684 has been rejected.

create implication grey_feathers -> feathers
create implication orange_feathers -> feathers
create implication peacock_feathers -> feathers
create implication falling_feathers -> feathers
create implication glowing_feather -> feathers
create implication hat_feather -> feathers
create implication feather_hair -> feathers

I would consider a separate BUR for feather hair. One might argue that the feathers aren't always notable.

This bulk update request has been rejected because it was not approved within 45 days.

The bulk update request #9679 (forum #209627) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.

This bulk update request has been rejected because it was not approved within 45 days.

The bulk update request #9684 (forum #209640) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.

What's the issue with this BUR then?