imply labia/clitoris piercing -> pussy piercing

BUR #10656 has been rejected.

create alias pussy_piercing -> labia_piercing

Two tags for the same thing.

Some of them look more like clitoris_piercing to me. Maybe deprecate instead?

I'd turn the alias around, there are some types of piercings in that area that do not involve the labia, for example clitoral hood or mons pubis (Wikipedia link).

BUR #10658 has been approved by @evazion.

create implication clitoris_piercing -> pussy_piercing
create implication labia_piercing -> pussy_piercing
mass update id:5070195,5070194,5070193,4776031,4457429,4457426 -> pussy_piercing

Hmm, good points. I have emptied pussy piercing into the two tags, and I'll propose this as alternative. There were a few posts where it was not possible to tell, so I removed the tag from those posts and added them as third line to the BUR (otherwise the site validation blocks the submission of the implication).

BUR #10659 has been rejected.

create alias clitoris_piercing -> clitoral_piercing

Bonus line.

The bulk update request #10656 (forum #214317) has been rejected by @evazion.

The bulk update request #10658 (forum #214321) has been approved by @evazion.

The bulk update request #10659 (forum #214322) has been rejected by @evazion.

nonamethanks said:

BUR #10659 has been rejected.

create alias clitoris_piercing -> clitoral_piercing

Bonus line.

Most other piercing tags use the form <noun>_piercing, not <adjective>_piercing. So we have penis piercing and tongue piercing, not penile piercing and lingual piercing.