BUR #12382 has been rejected.
create implication flower_eyepatch -> eyepatch
It's in the name. If you're already classifying it as an eyepatch, imply eyepatch.
Posted under Tags
BUR #12382 has been rejected.
create implication flower_eyepatch -> eyepatch
It's in the name. If you're already classifying it as an eyepatch, imply eyepatch.
I wouldn't expect post #5552624, post #5274013 to be in an eyepatch search. I’m in favor that we separate those from actual eyepatches like post #5417915.
Updated
isn't there already a tag that can include flowers growing out of eyes? is flower over eye good enough or is there an issue?
just take the growing flowers out of the eyepatch tag and put them in flower over eye so the flower eyepatches can be properly implicated.
I've gardened flower eyepatch and moved all the inappropriate ones to flower over eye, the implication can go through now.
p.s.flower eyepatch could imply flower as well.
Updated
There's also a few mistags for these in flower in eye btw.
The bulk update request #12382 (forum #221688) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.
The bulk update request #12516 (forum #222401) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.