BUR #15201 has been rejected.
create implication hugging_own_tail -> tail_hug
create implication hugging_another's_tail -> tail_hug
According to the tail hug wiki, both of these count as tail hugs by definition.
Posted under Tags
BUR #15201 has been rejected.
create implication hugging_own_tail -> tail_hug
create implication hugging_another's_tail -> tail_hug
According to the tail hug wiki, both of these count as tail hugs by definition.
BUR #15202 has been rejected.
deprecate tail_hug
Shouldn't we deprecate taiL_hug and use the specific action instead?
Tail hug is also used for situations where character uses its tail to hug other characters (e.g. post #5772397). It's even in the tag's wiki! So no, we should not deprecate the tag.
MyrMindservant said:
Tail hug is also used for situations where character uses its tail to hug other characters (e.g. post #5772397). It's even in the tag's wiki! So no, we should not deprecate the tag.
Maybe we should rename it to hugging_with_tail instead? and keep it separate from hugging own tail and hugging another's tail since they are different actions.
There is also tail wrap btw.
According to the wiki definition, hugging own tail/hugging another's tail don't count as tail hugs because tail hug is supposed to be for "tail hugging person", not "person hugging tail". But that's not how it's actually used, the majority of tail hug is "person hugging tail". So tail hug should probably be aliased to hugging tail and hugging with tail created to distinguish these two actions.
evazion said:
According to the wiki definition, hugging own tail/hugging another's tail don't count as tail hugs because tail hug is supposed to be for "tail hugging person", not "person hugging tail". But that's not how it's actually used, the majority of tail hug is "person hugging tail". So tail hug should probably be aliased to hugging tail and hugging with tail created to distinguish these two actions.
The wiki does say "a character is hugging, or being hugged by a tail or tails", so they should count. But I'm okay with splitting the tag.
The_Bob said:
The wiki does say "a character is hugging, or being hugged by a tail or tails", so they should count. But I'm okay with splitting the tag.
We should really move away from tags that can mean 2 different things, they always turn into a mess that needs to be split and deprecated anyway
Mexiguy said:
We should really move away from tags that can mean 2 different things, they always turn into a mess that needs to be split and deprecated anyway
Agreed.
We had the same issue with tail hold back in topic #19136, which ended up aliased to holding with tail. I think the best course is to rename the tag to hugging tail and keep the implications.
The bulk update request #15201 (forum #233480) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.
The bulk update request #15202 (forum #233481) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.