๐ŸŽ‰ Happy 19th Birthday to Danbooru! ๐ŸŽ‰
Danbooru

latex_thighhighs implications

Posted under Tags

I'd discourage the latter implication because due to existing implications, latex sometimes ends up on pictures where the clothes in question aren't being worn or are barely visible. Take post #6097808 (though it still has the panties) and post #2770846. I suppose objectively speaking the shiny clothes are still in the picture, but I don't think there's any value to it being included in the tag.

For that matter, is anyone searching shiny_clothes going to want to see standard, hospital-grade latex gloves? (One could ask the same question of the latex tag though.)

7HS said:

For that matter, is anyone searching shiny_clothes going to want to see standard, hospital-grade latex gloves? (One could ask the same question of the latex tag though.)

to be honest i really wouldnt include hospital-grade latex gloves in either of those tags myself, i proposed this implication because to me, the latex tags are reserved for stuff that actually looks shiny enough to be a relevant result in those searches. Even if those gloves are obviously made of latex from our irl knowledge, if it's not shown then no point tagging it, it's like tagging latex whenever any condom is visible because condoms are made of latex (and even then, at least most drawn condoms have a somewhat shiny look).

But understood, glad i put it on a separate BUR then

1