BUR #38601 has been rejected.
create implication death_korps_of_krieg -> astra_militarum
create implication death_korps_grenadier -> death_korps_of_krieg
The DKOK is a regiment of the Guard/am, and grenadiers are they're elite troops
Posted under Tags
BUR #38601 has been rejected.
create implication death_korps_of_krieg -> astra_militarum
create implication death_korps_grenadier -> death_korps_of_krieg
The DKOK is a regiment of the Guard/am, and grenadiers are they're elite troops
Previous thread of this topic: forum #330110
I think all the various regiments should imply AM, which is why I made the first BUR, but it was allowed to time out.
I'm not sure we need a special tag for the grenadiers, though, as the DKOK should be enough.
nonamethanks said:
mixed-category implications aren't allowed.
It wasn't mixed category when the BUR was first made. Someone keeps changing the AM regiments from char tags to gen tags.
The same thing happened when I made the previous BUR for all the AM regiments.
Edit: Fixed the regiments back to char tags again.
nth_color said:
Going by what the wikis for these tags say, they're group tags, so they should all be gentags and not character tags, no?
The general approach for WH40k chartags for groups is that you have the overarching chartag (Adeptus Astartes, Adepta Sororitas, Astra Militarum, etc.) and then anything more narrow than that gets gentags (Dark Angels, Death Korps of Krieg, etc.), because often the more narrow ones will actually be used for named characters - see Dark Angels being used on posts with only Lion El'Jonson, since he wears the armor - while the overarching chartags are supposed to be used for unnamed characters. It's essentially the same logic as using a race tag as a chartag (Eldar, T'au), because most of the time the tag in question will be used for unnamed characters, and you have to have some sort of chartag (see topic #19866 for similar).
If this wasn't changed for the Adeptus Astartes chapters in topic #25216, then the Astra Militarum subtags shouldn't be either.
The bulk update request #38601 (forum #341500) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.