BUR #38946 has been rejected.
create implication amazon_position -> girl_on_top
By definition, shouldn't the/a girl always be on top for this position?
Posted under Tags
BUR #38946 has been rejected.
create implication amazon_position -> girl_on_top
By definition, shouldn't the/a girl always be on top for this position?
Just by searching for amazon_position -girl_on_top you can find examples that aren't mistagged and don't warrant that implication. Also, if the characters were drawn upside down floating in space it wouldn't really be girl_on_top either.
The position also applies for men like post #6628376 and post #5647072.
The ability to reverse these positions to who's on top is why girl on top doesn't imply or isn't implied by anything.
The bulk update request #38946 (forum #342636) has been rejected by @nonamethanks.