imply Flaming weapon -> fire

BUR #39442 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

create implication flaming_weapon -> fire

Wiki states it must have fire.

BUR #39443 has been rejected.

create implication flaming_eye -> fire
create implication flaming_weapon -> fire
create implication flaming_hand -> fire
create implication flaming_skull -> fire
create implication flaming_crown -> fire

General "flaming" tags if people want all of them.

I decided not to indlude flaming_eyes as many posts in there seem to be mistagged eye trail posts.

The bulk update request #39442 (forum #345066) has been approved by @nonamethanks.

flaming eye is often used for things like post #9208494. That stuff shouldn't be under fire.

This bulk update request is pending automatic rejection in 5 days.

This bulk update request has been rejected because it was not approved within 45 days.

The bulk update request #39443 (forum #345067) has been rejected by @DanbooruBot.

nonamethanks said:

flaming eye is often used for things like post #9208494. That stuff shouldn't be under fire.

I don’t think that post would qualify for flaming eye either. It just looks like red glowing eyes with an eye trail to me. How can it qualify for flaming eye if you can’t even tell if there’s any fire? Conversely, if visible fire is a requirement, wouldn’t it make sense to implicate it?

Blank_User said:

I don’t think that post would qualify for flaming eye either. It just looks like red glowing eyes with an eye trail to me. How can it qualify for flaming eye if you can’t even tell if there’s any fire? Conversely, if visible fire is a requirement, wouldn’t it make sense to implicate it?

Agree that is eye_trail not flaming_eye but some flaming eye seems closer to aura? Examples like post #9130373 or post #830958 which I wouldn't tag fire.

BUR #41295 is pending approval.

create implication flaming_weapon -> weapon
create implication flaming_sword -> sword

Self explanatory. At the moment flaming_sword doesen't lead to anything other than flaming weapon being tagged, which only leads to fire.

Before someone goes "but sword already implies weapon" not all flaming weapons are swords.

BUR #41296 is pending approval.

create implication flaming_skull -> skull
create implication flaming_skull -> fire
create implication flaming_crown -> skull
create implication flaming_crown -> fire

nonamethanks said:

flaming eye is often used for things like post #9208494. That stuff shouldn't be under fire.

In that case we are still missing