imply blunt_sidelocks -> sidelocks

BUR #39927 has been approved by @nonamethanks.

create implication blunt_sidelocks -> sidelocks

sidelocks are sidelocks

Isn't this just blunt_tresses?

Oh wait, I guess not, tresses are in bunches.

The bulk update request #39927 (forum #346949) has been approved by @nonamethanks.