Posted under Tags
BUR #39933 is pending approval.
create implication artoria_pendragon_alter_(swimsuit_rider)_(fate) -> saber_alter
create implication santa_alter -> saber_alter
As I was suggested to do in the FGO implications thread I'm making a thread for this one, both of these characters are forms of specifically Saber Alter, so they should be under her and not just Saber IMO.
If this does go through the implications to the umbrella Artoria tag should be removed. As-is don't think the specific re-implication is necessary and the remaining Fate ""umbrella"" tags (Elizabeth Bathory, Mordred, Jeanne d'Arc, Jeanne d'Arc Alter) have other untangling issues and Artoria is the final boss of that.
Ylimegirl said:
If this does go through the implications to the umbrella Artoria tag should be removed. As-is don't think the specific re-implication is necessary and the remaining Fate ""umbrella"" tags (Elizabeth Bathory, Mordred, Jeanne d'Arc, Jeanne d'Arc Alter) have other untangling issues and Artoria is the final boss of that.
Can't you have implications under implications, so I'm suggesting the tag goes Artoria, Saber Alter, Santa Alter.
Witch-Hunter-Siegfried said:
Can't you have implications under implications, so I'm suggesting the tag goes Artoria, Saber Alter, Santa Alter.
You can, but if you don't unimply the first implication it'll show up in the nested tree multiple times, like this:
artoria_pendragon_(fate) ↳ artoria_pendragon_alter_(swimsuit_rider)_(fate) ↳ saber_alter ↳ artoria_pendragon_alter_(swimsuit_rider)_(fate)
Updated
