Posted under Tags
BUR #40325 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create alias artoria_pendragon_(lancer_alter)_(royal_icing)_(fate) -> artoria_pendragon_(royal_icing)_(fate)
Idea is simple, I'm proposing removing extra parentheticals from costumes with unambiguous names. This one is the biggest of the tags (and also probably the most likely to be rejected if I had to guess). No other Artorias with a Royal Icing costume, no reason to specify lancer alter.
Related: forum #348771
Updated
BUR #40326 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create alias artoria_pendragon_(lancer_alter)_(ox-demon_king)_(fate) -> artoria_pendragon_(ox-demon_king)_(fate)
create alias artoria_pendragon_(lancer)_(tour_outfit)_(fate) -> artoria_pendragon_(tour_outfit)_(fate)
Same deal. Eta: removing Artoria Pendragon (Lancer Alter) (Traveling Outfit), i forgor about Saber Alter (Traveling Outfit); moving to separate BUR
Related: forum #348771
Updated
BUR #40327 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create alias elizabeth_bathory_(cinderella)_(scullery_maid)_(fate) -> elizabeth_bathory_(scullery_maid)_(fate)
Cinder Liz
BUR #40328 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create alias jacques_de_molay_(foreigner)_(method_to_walk_on_the_stars)_(fate) -> jacques_de_molay_(method_to_walk_on_the_stars)_(fate)
We don't even really have costume tags for male Molay.
BUR #40336 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create alias li_shuwen_(old)_(bar-troia)_(fate) -> li_shuwen_(bar-troia)_(fate)
You really can't tell with these timestamps that I tend to prowl the forums right before bed. Anyways, Li Shuwen
BUR #40337 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create alias gilles_de_rais_(caster)_(phantom_night)_(fate) -> gilles_de_rais_(phantom_night)_(fate)
create alias gilles_de_rais_(caster)_(holy_night_supper)_(fate) -> gilles_de_rais_(holy_night_supper)_(fate)
Gilles costumes
BUR #40338 has been rejected.
create alias medea_(lily)_(manor_of_repose)_(fate) -> medea_(manor_of_repose)_(fate)
I still believe the tag should be medea_lily instead of medea_(lily), but forum #319927 was rejected so if we're going this route, it's unambiguous.
BUR #40339 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create alias fergus_mac_roich_(young)_(welcome_diner)_(fate) -> fergus_mac_roich_(welcome_diner)_(fate)
Fergus
BUR #40340 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create alias diarmuid_ua_duibhne_(saber)_(festival_outfit)_(fate) -> diarmuid_ua_duibhne_(festival_outfit)_(fate)
Diarmuid
BUR #40341 has been rejected.
create alias cu_chulainn_(caster)_(formal_dress)_(fate) -> cu_chulainn_(formal_dress)_(fate)
Caster Cu part 1.
BUR #40342 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create alias cu_chulainn_(caster)_(formal_dress)_(fate) -> cu_chulainn_(formal_dress)_(fate)
Caster Cu part two. Separating because there's also Cu Chulainn Alter (Formal Dress), so some people might still consider this ambiguous.
BUR #40343 has been rejected.
create alias ushi_gozen_(avenger)_(second_ascension)_(fate) -> ushi_gozen_(second_ascension)_(fate)
create alias ushi_gozen_(avenger)_(third_ascension)_(fate) -> ushi_gozen_(third_ascension)_(fate)
I lied, this one is actually the one most likely to be rejected. Ushi Gozen (Rider) isn't in FGO so she doesn't have ascensions. Okie this should be it for now I think.
BUR #40344 has been rejected.
create alias artoria_pendragon_(lancer_alter)_(traveling_outfit)_(fate) -> artoria_pendragon_(traveling_outfit)_(fate)
Moving to separate BUR because I forgor that this could potentially be ambiguous with Saber Alter (Traveling Outfit). Though come to think of it maybe we should change tituria's alter tags from artoria_pendragon_(lancer_alter) to artoria_pendragon_alter_(lancer)? eta: forum #348765
Updated
The bulk update request #40341 (forum #348758) has been rejected by @Ylimegirl.
BUR #40345 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create alias cu_chulainn_(caster)_(event_portrait)_(fate) -> cu_chulainn_(event_portrait)_(fate)
Caster Cu part 1 redux, aka what I actually meant that BUR to be instead of a retroactive duplicate of part 2.
BUR #40358 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create alias james_moriarty_(archer)_(fgo_fes._2023)_(fate) -> james_moriarty_(fgo_fes._2023)_(fate)
create alias james_moriarty_(ruler)_(dream_portrait)_(fate) -> james_moriarty_(dream_portrait)_(fate)
create alias james_moriarty_(ruler)_(winter_party)_(fate) -> james_moriarty_(winter_party)_(fate)
Moriarty
I feel in most of these cases it's valuable information to have the variant the costume belongs to in the tag. For some of them less so (like Caster Cu) but for stuff like Artoria Lancer or Moriarty's different versions the base forms themselves are visually distinct enough as "people" that costume tags should also reflect which version they belong to, imo
Astolfo said:
I feel in most of these cases it's valuable information to have the variant the costume belongs to in the tag. For some of them less so (like Caster Cu) but for stuff like Artoria Lancer or Moriarty's different versions the base forms themselves are visually distinct enough as "people" that costume tags should also reflect which version they belong to, imo
That's what the implication hierarchy is for.
Ylimegirl said:
That's what the implication hierarchy is for.
Tbh I forgot that existed for a moment, so point taken, although while that does work on a post itself it's still not very obvious when just seeing a tag in suggestions/autocomplete or such. Also I think there are various costume tags that are either unimplied, or implied to the wrong variant because of an active effort not to do nested implications?
Astolfo said:
Also I think there are various costume tags that are either unimplied, or implied to the wrong variant because of an active effort not to do nested implications?
Yep, a lot of these are missing implications. Something I'm actively working on laying the groundwork for with updating wiki pages & uploads of CGs, but not submitting the actual BURs for (yet). I don't think any of these are currently implied to the wrong variant, just unimplied period.
