BUR #40447 has been rejected.
create implication standing_split -> flexible
From the flexible wiki: "Referring to the ability to perform positions requiring a higher amount of body mobility than the average human has."
Posted under Tags
BUR #40447 has been rejected.
create implication standing_split -> flexible
From the flexible wiki: "Referring to the ability to perform positions requiring a higher amount of body mobility than the average human has."
post #5235550
post #5662029
edit:
post #4139501 is another example. She "succeeded" at doing a standing split by taking her entire leg off which obviously doesn't require any flexibility.
Updated by wispydreamer
wispydreamer said:
are these really actually splits tho? or just...leg up or something lol
fairyboobles said:
are these really actually splits tho? or just...leg up or something lol
The danbooru definition states that a split is "a gymnastic position wherein the legs slide into opposite directions away from the body, causing them to be either parallel or perpendicular to the ground".
Those two examples shown above are not splits, let alone standing ones. The second is an attempt at best. The first image is… ambiguous, but definitely not a split.
Related topic #25960
fairyboobles said:
are these really actually splits tho? or just...leg up or something lol
aster1a said:
The danbooru definition states that a split is "a gymnastic position wherein the legs slide into opposite directions away from the body, causing them to be either parallel or perpendicular to the ground".
Those two examples shown above are not splits, let alone standing ones. The second is an attempt at best. The first image is… ambiguous, but definitely not a split.
They're both intended to be attempts at standing splits and there's no reason they should not be tagged as such along with failure. As Unbreakable has pointed out this is also why split isn't implicated to flexible.
The bulk update request #40447 (forum #349158) has been rejected by @nonamethanks.