Pokémon Pokopia character implications

BUR #47490 has been rejected.

create implication female_protagonist_(pokemon_pokopia) -> transformed_ditto
create implication male_protagonist_(pokemon_pokopia) -> transformed_ditto

The player character in Pokémon Pokopia is a Ditto that has transformed to look like a human.

Meh'd because I imagine there's some future benefit to keeping these two blobby blorbos separated from the general ditto tag depending on how much fanart we get of them.

If someone draws a human version of the character or if the character's real appearance is revealed in the future, then the implication would be a problem. I don't think it's a good idea.

This bulk update request is pending automatic rejection in 5 days.

The bulk update request #47490 (forum #386753) has been rejected by @Hillside_Moose.

BUR #50705 has been approved by @Hillside_Moose.

create implication peakychu -> pikachu
create implication mosslax -> snorlax
create implication smearguru -> smeargle
create implication professor_tangrowth -> tangrowth

New variant Pokémon revealed in the most recent trailer.

The bulk update request #50705 (forum #398572) has been approved by @Hillside_Moose.