BUR #51356 has been approved by @evazion.
create implication shingyoku_(orb) -> shingyoku_(touhou)
Given there's both art of the Orb solo and art of the other 2 forms without the orb the orb really shouldn't share the parent tag.
Posted under Tags
BUR #51356 has been approved by @evazion.
create implication shingyoku_(orb) -> shingyoku_(touhou)
Given there's both art of the Orb solo and art of the other 2 forms without the orb the orb really shouldn't share the parent tag.
The bulk update request #51356 (forum #401181) has been approved by @evazion.
Shouldn't this tag be Shingyoku (Orb) (Touhou)?
BUR #51429 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create alias shingyoku_(orb) -> shingyoku_(orb)_(touhou)
Yes it should.
BUR #51430 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create alias shingyoku_(female) -> shingyoku_(female)_(touhou)
create alias shingyoku_(male) -> shingyoku_(male)_(touhou)
The other subtags don't have the qualifier either...
hasu_no_tokimeki said:
BUR #51430 has been approved by @nonamethanks.
create alias shingyoku_(female) -> shingyoku_(female)_(touhou)
create alias shingyoku_(male) -> shingyoku_(male)_(touhou)The other subtags don't have the qualifier either...
That's what I was going off when I made the tag, but qualification isn't a bad idea.
The bulk update request #51430 (forum #401476) has been approved by @nonamethanks.
The bulk update request #51429 (forum #401475) has been approved by @nonamethanks.