Tag Implication: minifigure -> LEGO

Implicating minifigure -> LEGO.

Reason: Term used for "LEGO men", as referred to by some.

We only have 11 posts in lego and I don't really see it growing at any kind of rate, we only had 8 until last week and the last post before that was 6 months ago. I'd say just do it by hand.

Minifig is basically lego's character, too, so I would have to say no on that front as well as we don't do char -> copy implications.

Adding an implication for a tag used on TWO pictures that haven't even been approved yet?

You're getting ahead of yourself.

I've seen other products labeled as mini-figures before, so I think if those specific things were to have a tag it'd be more logical to use "LEGO_men" or lego_person instead. The tag would be instantly recognizable as to what it's referring to, where minifigure might be more open for confusion.

Also as everyone else is pointing out, there just isn't enough images yet to warrant an implication.