What Is the Relation between These Two Illustrations?

• post #682355, 2nd June, artist: Asakawa Remon

• post #683437, 4th June, artist: Chikasatani

I can think of a number of explanations, but without any, it seems really weird that the images are credited differently. And how does one parent a pair like this?

Asakawa Remon colored Chikasatani's line art. Disregard the danbooru dates, his colored version was uploaded to Pixiv three days later.

I'd suggest tagging both images with chikasatani. In the past other lineart images like post #624791 have been made the parent post to the colored versions, too.

7HS said:
I'd suggest tagging both images with chikasatani.

And I suggest against. It's annoying having one pixiv post tagged with two pixiv artists, and the parent-child link is enough for this.

RaisingK said:

It's annoying having one pixiv post tagged with two pixiv artists[.]

I may accept that if you care to explain why.

RaisingK said:

[T]he parent-child link is enough for this.

Are we supposed to just know it cannot be anything else but original line art vs. a version colored by the other artist, or should this be explained in the comments?

It is annoying but precedent has been set multiple times and I believe a lineart credit thread has occurred once before but I can't recall any other specifics about it other than it boiled down to give credit to everyone who worked on a particular image.

Also worth tagging colored for post #682355. Wish there was a more distinct way to indicate which artist is the one providing the lineart, but the best we can do is the comments.

Mysterio006 said:
Also worth tagging colored for post #682355. Wish there was a more distinct way to indicate which artist is the one providing the lineart, but the best we can do is the comments.

I suggested some kind of image_response tag a long time ago but nobody liked the idea. Parenting was deemed to be enough, and in most cases it is.