Tag implication, Ariship -> Flying

I realise there could be Airships on the ground but there are a lot of them lacking the flying tag. If I find any I shall let you know.

It's better if you just add flying where appropriate.

So long as there are plausible exceptions, an implication or alias is always a bad idea.

"Ariship" → "Airship" might be a good idea though j/k

I apologice for the spelling. Allmost non of the airship pictures has the flying tag in them.

What I would realy like is to have an one time implication and then I would remove the tag from the three picks that isnt flying.

There go ahead and fix them. Not an implication but I did effectively the same.

A mass edit is what you are asking for then, not an implication. I went to do it myself, but airship -flying returns nothing, so someone must have already done it. Feel free to remove the tag where it doesn't apply.

I can't remember if regular members have access to tag scripting or not. If you do, it'd be relatively easy for you to do things like this yourself in the future (after discussing it here of course).

EDIT: Log must have been one who got to it (and posted here) before me.

Shinjidude said:
I can't remember if regular members have access to tag scripting or not. If you do, it'd be relatively easy for you to do things like this yourself in the future (after discussing it here of course).

Was restricted to priv and above to help curb vandalism.

Fixed, sorry for the delay.

Also there are only two pics with airships where nothing is flying.

As others have noted, where there are entirely plausible exceptions we generally don't do an implication.