Tag Implication: single_thighhigh -> asymmetrical_clothing

Implicating single_thighhigh -> asymmetrical_clothing.

Reason: Self explanatory.

In the past I've added both single_thighhigh and asymmetrical_clothing to images such as post #657231. However, the above example doesn't fit very well in the spirit of asymmetrical_clothing, and I've considered removing the tag. I imagine an implication here would go too far, including images where the single_thighhigh is not so much a part of fashion but instead a state of undress, for example.

It doesn't seem to fit, unless there is another article of clothing that is causing the unevenness. Having one sock or thighhigh just means that, just one with nothing to counter the other.

I stick with what I said in forum #40674.

I think I'd say no to this because situations like getting dressed/undressed don't seem to fit the spirit of the asymmetrical clothing tag. Better to tag it manually where needed.