arms_behind_back (1594) <--> hands_behind_back
arm_behind_back <--> hand_behind_back (18)
Either direction, just for some consistency. I prefer "hand(s)", but arms_behind_back is what's getting used...
Updated by NWF Renim
Posted under General
arms_behind_back (1594) <--> hands_behind_back
arm_behind_back <--> hand_behind_back (18)
Either direction, just for some consistency. I prefer "hand(s)", but arms_behind_back is what's getting used...
Updated by NWF Renim
Given that we've aliased hands_behind_head to arms_behind_head, we should probably stick to similar naming. Of course we can always reverse that alias if we choose hands_behind_back.