wiki: futa_on_female
'If you can't see the genitals of one or more of the females involved, use the rule of "fully female until proven otherwise".'
This line has been added by Kayako a year ago. Since futa_on_female has never been discussed in the forum, I ask if this statement is generally supported.
From the first page of the tag:
post #769371
post #762599
post #761411 (read the comments about the sound effects)
post #750409
post #740637
post #724971, post #724972 ,post #724973
If it is supported, what counts as proof? A sound effect (I'm not sure about the translation, though)? A pixiv tag (note that tags added by the artist themselves are marked with an asterisk *, other tags can't count as proof) aka "word of god" = "the artist said so"?
In all those pictures, the genitals aren't visible. They either lack a source or the futanari tag on pixiv. Could be futa, tribadism, strap-on other sex toys.
Updated by Katajanmarja