Tag Implication: hair_over_one_eye --> one_eye_covered

Since the hair is covering an eye. While we're at it, it might also be a good idea to have hair_over_eyes aliased to hair_covering_eyes and hair_covering_one_eye aliased to hair_over_one_eye since it might be easy to confuse them otherwise.

covering_one_eye is mostly deliberate coverage of one eye with one's hand, not passive like with hair.

But covering_one_eye is a separate tag from one_eye_covered though. The former does have images such as
post #921380
post #994441
post #150503
however, which demonstrate passive covering of the eye.

Perhaps it would be better to move the passive examples to one_eye_covered and redefine covering_one_eye more specifically to apply to active instances. Or at least change covering_one_eye to hand_covering_one_eye/hand_over_one_eye to make the distinction more clear-cut.

Meanwhile one_eye_covered would be a supertag covering all instances of a single eye being covered, including hair_over_one_eye, bandage_over_one_eye, and the above active examples. People looking specifically for an eye being covered passively can then use one_eye_covered -covering_one_eye.

Anonymous9000 said:
But covering_one_eye is a separate tag from one_eye_covered though. The former does have images such as
post #921380
post #994441
post #150503
however, which demonstrate passive covering of the eye.

Those should be moved, then.

Anonymous9000 said:
hand_covering_one_eye/hand_over_one_eye to make the distinction more clear-cut.

-1 because you can cover your eyes with other things
post #1070819
post #978611
post #916091
post #603077
post #189326
post #566228

I suggest the following definition for covering_one_eye then:
"Instances in which a character is holding a hand or object in front of one of their eyes."

I do think there are enough instances of hands to merit its own specific tag beneath covering_one_eye.