Danbooru

Tag implication nipple penetration -> bad anatomy

Posted under General

-1. I think this would set a bad precedent for later decisions on what should fall under the bad_anatomy tag. The bad_anatomy tag should speak more towards the quality of the image, and not on whether some aspect of the piece is unrealistic or not.

Additionally, I think it would not be unreasonable to assume at some point that there may be some monster girl or alien girl image where nipple_penetration would not be unrealistic in regards to them.

Bad anatomy is only for those posts that are badly drawn in regards to anatomy, not for those posts that give a middle-finger to anatomy and decide to do whatever the fuck they want.

We could have a tag that encompasses unrealistic or fantastic acts or dimensions, but I'm not sure if there is a need for it.

We have a tag for an extreme degree of lack of realism: surreal.

We can consider creating an additional tag named those posts that give a middle-finger to anatomy and decide to do whatever the fuck they want, or something shorter: unrealistic sex.

If we ignore "alien anatomy" (including tails and wings) for a moment, the subsets of unrealistic sex would be:

For now, I did something much simpler and perhaps more useful than creating a parent tag. I just added a section "Unrealistic sex" to Tag group:Sex acts.

Nipple penetration might also be 'realistic' for certain inherently unrealistic characters -- googirls, girls made entirely of living rubber, characters that explicitly exist according to cartoon physics, etc. Tagging those with bad anatomy would clearly be a mistake.

1