Posted under General
Tag implications:
Reason:
type of shirt -> shirt
For comparison, here are some related implications already done:
EDIT:
Additional, related, implications:
Reasons:
Tank tops are sleeveless shirts.
Sleeveless shirts are sleeveless.
Updated by S1eth
Hillside_Moose said:
I'm not really liking the tank_top implications. Don't know why.
I suggest taking a good look at at least 4 or 5 pages of tank_top to see if there's anything you wouldn't want to be tagged sleeveless shirt.
Then, looking at the same number of pages of sleeveless_shirt to double-check your conclusions.
Then don't forget to tell us what you think.
Anyway... 15 days have passed without implications, so: *bumps*
Updated by Danielx21
I've never found shirt to be particularly useful. It just has over 30k posts because of all the implications. Other than those cases, it looks like people use the shirt tag for any piece of upper-body clothing that doesn't have its own tag (or the user doesn't know the tag)
The open_shirt wiki already says:
A shirt or blouse that has been unbuttoned and left hanging open.
=The open_shirt -> shirt implication should be removed.
The impossible_shirt tag is also used for clothes that aren't shirts because it would be too cumbersome to create impossible_x tags for every single piece of clothing. Same for wet_shirt and torn_shirt.
Isn't that why impossible clothing tag exists, though?
To clarify: this is generally how the tags are used:
If the character wears a dress, open_dress is used.
It the character wears a skirt/pants/bottomless/etc. and any top, open_shirt is used for the top.
Other tags which don't fit in there have their own well populated tags:
open_kimono, open_robe, open_bra etc.
open_clothes is the umbrella. (also used if the tagger has no idea what the article of clothing actually is)
Impossible_x were created much later, but use the same terms. Users who tagged open_shirt before use impossible_shirt the same way.
