Tag implication: twincest -> twins

Tag implication: twincest -> twins
Reason:

twincest is incest between twins. There doesn't really seem to be a problem with them being tagged incest as well, but several pages of posts tagged twincest are not tagged twins. Since there are twins in these images, they should still show up in a search for twins even though they are also tagged twincest.

An alternative solution would be to do away with the twincest tag, and make sure that all of the images currently in it are properly tagged twins. It doesn't appear to be used that much, with under 200 images tagged. incest twins should theoretically return pretty much the same results. Of course, this could limit the ability of normal users to find the images currently tagged twincest, since it would require both of their two tags to search for it.

EDIT: After thinking about it, that problem exists with searching for other specific forms of incest as well.

The tag limit on normal users isn't taken into consideration when making or maintaining tags or pools. The purpose of the limit is to encourage people to upgrade their accounts.

If twincest is seen as an worthwhile tag it should implicate both incest and twins.

Jerl said:
It doesn't appear to be used that much, with under 200 images tagged.

There are actually 359 (26 deleted) posts under the twincest tag. 66 (7 deleted) posts out of the 328 (21 deleted) posts under the incest twins search are not also tagged twincest. Given the total images under the combination search it would indicate that the tag is actually more used than the combination of the incest and twins tags.

Which is a problem, since incest twins should at least have everything in twincest, if not more.

If this tag implication goes through, such should be the case. And the tag implication really should go through.

Perhaps discussion on the removal of the "twincest" tag should wait until the implication has been officially decided on.

I was going to edit this in: The discrepancy appears that 97 of the post under the twincest tag are not tagged twins. The majority of those posts are over a year old though and the majority couples depicted in them are fraternal twins as opposed to identical twins (perhaps people are less likely to tag them twins). Well, more accurately the majority of the "couples" are pairings of Kagamine Rin and Kagamine Len.

Is twincest only for twins, or does it apply to triplets & up?

In my opinion it'd be close enough to apply. It's not like it'd be a common enough case to warrant its own tag.

Did twincest -> twins. -> incest already existed.