Tag Implication interlocked_fingers -> holding_hands

Implicating interlocked_fingers to holding hands.

Reason: The wiki states that interlocked fingers is for when one or more characters are holding hands with another.

It's only holding_hands when it involves more than 1 character.

S1eth said:
It's only holding_hands when it involves more than 1 character.

We have hands clasped for solo.

forum #62982
interlocked_fingers + holding_hands or
interlocked_fingers + hands_together

I just woke up so i'm a little slow right now. Should we be updating some wikis, because i'm a little confused?

i was reading replies in forum #39583 when i encountered interlocked_fingers. i chose to raise the issue here since it was raised here before. the issue is regarding its seemingly unclear definition. interlocked_fingers states "When one or more characters have their fingers interlocking in the spaces of on another." and "See hands_clasped when one character does this with both of their own hands."

is interlocked_fingers supposedly an umbrella tag for interlaced fingers regardless of the number of personalities involved?

is hands_clasped a specific subset of the above for one person only?

or is it better to revise the wiki of interlocked_fingers and limit it to "two or more characters" instead?

and how is it exactly when one post qualifies under hands_clasped? is it enough that the fingers of the same person are interlaced? should the palms be together? currently, gendou_pose implicates hands_clasped. but it should be noted that the palms are not touching. are the palms important?

"one another" refers to other fingers here, not other characters. Otherwise the "one or more characters" part would be nonsensical.