Posted under General
Coming across post #1232449, I'm extremely tempted to tag it x-ray glasses or revealing cutout, but it doesn't quite fit the definition of either (a bladeless fan is neither glasses nor a torn layer). It also doesn't fit the definition being used by x-ray vision for the one post currently in that tag. Is this something unique enough it should have it's own tag? Is there something we use that could be coerced to fit?
Updated by a moderator
Personally, I think since it technically grants some sort of x-ray vision through a device, it should be tagged as x-ray_glasses. The idea is the same, the use of a physical medium to see through clothing. Maybe there should be some sort of encompassing tag for things like this? For example, in post #1126317 there is clearly a use of an x-ray device (the Lens of Truth), but that itself isn't visible to us. Maybe x-ray_vision can be used in any case that one can see through clothing like that.
Hmm, it looks like I abandoned this two months ago, due to forum #81311 I've come upon post #1232449 again and had the same thoughts. I still don't really like using *_glasses for a post in which no glasses are even implied to exist. Any idea for a good name for a tag that would both generalize the x-ray_glasses concept and allow for posts like post #1232449 and post #1126317 ?
X-ray_vision should do quite nicely. For the wiki: "An image displaying the ability of seeing through clothes, walls or other objects.".
I guess there doesn't specifically need to be a localized component implied by the tag name. If this is fine, we probably ought to have an x-ray_glasses -> x-ray_vision implication, since the effect is always present with the glasses.
Shouldn't this be an implication rather than an alias? The glasses theme is a popular and unique subset of the generalized x-ray_vision here.
