Tag implication: open_shirt --> shirt.

I have an obvious idea: let's make open_shirt --> shirt implication.

Let's not. topic #7174

S1eth said:

Let's not. topic #7174

But if shirt is open, it is still visible, right? Otherwise, there is no shirt at all and picture should be tagged topless/nude (if there are any humans). Oh wait... If this tag applies not only to shirt...

Sorry, I have missed something again...

The "shirt" in "open_shirt" refers to much more than what "shirt" currently tags.

Heck, you only have to look at the first few pages to find images such as post #1522876, which is a haori (but we don't tag them when miko wear them, usually because the miko tag is used instead.)

7HS said:

Heck, you only have to look at the first few pages to find images such as post #1522876, which is a haori (but we don't tag them when miko wear them, usually because the miko tag is used instead.)

That's just some random sleeveless shirt. Haori don't have collars.

Serlo said:

The "shirt" in "open_shirt" refers to much more than what "shirt" currently tags.

Then alias open_shirt to open_top.

Then everyone will start dumping jackets and bikinis into open_top because "top" is so vague that it includes basically everything worn above the waist. It was the same problem encountered with top_lift and why we aliased it to shirt_lift.