at this point this is 80% into his pixiv and he still tag it original. you have to intentionally check original for it to be displayed, so is it narcism?
at this point this is 80% into his pixiv and he still tag it original. you have to intentionally check original for it to be displayed, so is it narcism?
Like how Danbooru uses original, on Pixiv it's supposed to be any work that doesn't take any elements from existing copyrights.
This is false. It has nothing to do with copyrights on Pixiv:
"Original (γͺγͺγΈγγ«) is a tag used to define works that are done, and created originally without taking any derivative elements from any existing works."
The opposite of Pixiv's "Original" tag would basically be the "derivative work" tag here. I used to upload my own art to Pixiv and it was required to choose this for anything that wasn't photo-referenced, a variation on someone else's work, etc.
And if you did come, the akward feeling of being the odd one out make you wish you hadn't come in the first place (TvT). Ah the joy of low self-esteem and social anxiety.
The artist's enthusiasm isn't in doubt, but why go to the trouble of making this short clip, when this exactly is already in the anime with a much higher quality?
The artist's enthusiasm isn't in doubt, but why go to the trouble of making this short clip, when this exactly is already in the anime with a much higher quality?
If the artist enjoys the pairing and wants to draw it, I think they should draw it. I personally welcome the fan content, and I don't think the series existing should make people not make fan content.
The artist's enthusiasm isn't in doubt, but why go to the trouble of making this short clip, when this exactly is already in the anime with a much higher quality?
are you asking why one would draw a person when you can just take a picture?