AI-generated art check thread

post #9680448

Repeating my comment:

As much as I like this work, the artist's Twitter does have an abundance of A.I. generated content. But they've also shown that they can at least illustrate in this style and make simple animations.

Though the animation in this post is a bit more advanced than that, and seems to be at least AI-assisted if not fully generated. They have another animation that clearly uses AI in the process.

It's likely they did draw the base illustration but then used AI to animate it. I'm not sure where that falls within the rules.

Flagged this one. post #9657094

luntoer said:

post #9680448

Repeating my comment:

As much as I like this work, the artist's Twitter does have an abundance of A.I. generated content. But they've also shown that they can at least illustrate in this style and make simple animations.

Though the animation in this post is a bit more advanced than that, and seems to be at least AI-assisted if not fully generated. They have another animation that clearly uses AI in the process.

It's likely they did draw the base illustration but then used AI to animate it. I'm not sure where that falls within the rules.

Comparing the AI-generated animation and the human-made animation, post #9680448 is closer to the latter. The AI animation has many tells. Skintone changes. Tongue melts with mouth closes. Texts in eyes are messed up as the eyes blink. This animation also has a much higher frame rate and a lot of hand poses and mouth positions. post #9680448 though has a low frame rate, has only three or so keyframes for the mouths to play back and forth, hands barely move, texts aren't affected by eyelids, and the movements all look like simple riggings of paint layers. It's not likely AI-assisted.

miychi
mashiro www
kira_yuip

kira_yuip has deleted the old raora post from twitter and the new posts are completely different style that is similar to mashiro_www. Also profile now states SD+CSP

mashiro_www had a twitter post (now deleted) with a messed up ribbon that raised suspicion. post #9708177 has a weird oddity in the eye mask pattern.

miychi has strange eyes which I'm not sure if it's a deliberate style or simply tracing over generated image. I'm not sure if miychi is connected with the other two but it's strange that all three use the same kind of parallel brush effect.

Any thoughts on tagging mashiro and miychi as ai-assisted?

Smellydung said:

miychi
mashiro www
kira_yuip

kira_yuip has deleted the old raora post from twitter and the new posts are completely different style that is similar to mashiro_www. Also profile now states SD+CSP

mashiro_www had a twitter post (now deleted) with a messed up ribbon that raised suspicion. post #9708177 has a weird oddity in the eye mask pattern.

miychi has strange eyes which I'm not sure if it's a deliberate style or simply tracing over generated image. I'm not sure if miychi is connected with the other two but it's strange that all three use the same kind of parallel brush effect.

Any thoughts on tagging mashiro and miychi as ai-assisted?

If nothing else is noteworthy about miychi than strange (subjective) eyes then no, no reason to tag them ai-assisted. Their eyes are unique, consistent across multiple images, and symmetrical.

mashiro_www's post #9708177 has weird hair near her right-hand-side shoulder. Hair and dress also interact strangely. It's probably ai-assisted.

I want a second opinion on mordredpenx a lot of his posts have very weird artificing like post #8248565 inconsistent eyes like post #9444664 and post #9215227 and I strongly suspect this one on Pixiv is fully AI without any touch-ups.

Thoughts? I want to check before I flag and tag.

zetsubousensei said:

I want a second opinion on mordredpenx a lot of his posts have very weird artificing like post #8248565 inconsistent eyes like post #9444664 and post #9215227 and I strongly suspect this one on Pixiv is fully AI without any touch-ups.

Thoughts? I want to check before I flag and tag.

Yeah, please flag and tag all of them

zetsubousensei said:

I want a second opinion on mordredpenx a lot of his posts have very weird artificing like post #8248565 inconsistent eyes like post #9444664 and post #9215227 and I strongly suspect this one on Pixiv is fully AI without any touch-ups.

Thoughts? I want to check before I flag and tag.

never mind, I defer to the opinion above

post #8926066

Is this ai-generated? I don't think the animation is AI but the boobs scream AI.

Like...Why is the hair not hanging down? Did the person who made this not think about gravity or does AI not understand what upside down hair looks like?

It's almost certainly just their style.

post #9563438
Artist has no prior offences. Bad flag?

ion288 said:

post #9563438
Artist has no prior offences. Bad flag?

Bad flag. Nothing wrong with the picture, multiple animated versions that look legitimate, plus artist has a track record of posting WIP on Twitter.

asset #30162380

Having doubts.

MaskedAvenger said:

asset #30162380

Having doubts.

There are red flags. Extra wrinkle above the eye. Messy blush shading. Inconsistent fingernail shading. Bikini top's shape looks weird, the bottom edge continuing into her right arm while it should have met the vertical edge at roughly under her wrist. This is probably ai-generated, unfortunately.

haru_(pixiv_117179573)

Leaning towards "yes", but wanted a second opinion (as the tag adder is a random member).

Knowledge_Seeker said:

haru_(pixiv_117179573)

Leaning towards "yes", but wanted a second opinion (as the tag adder is a random member).

The hair looks very suspicious to me. Edit: I was going to flag them, but apparently, I reached my limit a couple of days ago.

Knowledge_Seeker said:

haru_(pixiv_117179573)

Leaning towards "yes", but wanted a second opinion (as the tag adder is a random member).

Placeholder1996 said:

The hair looks very suspicious to me. Edit: I was going to flag them, but apparently, I reached my limit a couple of days ago.

I flagged them

post #9428217
Flagg without a tag.

ion288 said:

post #9428217
Flagg without a tag.

Brushstrokes look human - in fact some parts amateurishly so, especially Patchouli's chest. I suspect traced over AI. Tagging ai-assisted for now.

post #9284982

And another one. No other post of this artist is tagged with AI.
Not really something I'm inclined to reapprove but still :/