Tag-What-You-See question: Canonical giantess?

I removed the giantess tag from post #767329, since even though the character is canonically a giantess, there's nothing to indicate it in that pic, and we're supposed to tag what we see, right?

Someone added it back (and presumably voted down my comment explaining why I'd removed it); looking over its tag history, this had happened before with two different people.

So I thought I'd ask here to make sure my understanding is correct -- an image like that shouldn't be tagged giantess, right?

you're right, given the context of the scene, theres nothing about it that would make me think the person is bigger then normal.

You are correct, it should not have that tag.

I agree, there needs to be a visual cue in the image to tag it as giantess. The lack of such a visual cue should mean that the image does not receive that tag.