Posted under General
Implicating konpaku youmu (ghost) -> konpaku youmu and ghost.
Reason: Half of the character in question and a description of what that half is. There are some images where only the ghost half appears, so I'm less certain about the first implication.
Updated by Aristocrat
Log said:
Nope.
Clarify yourself, please. I admitted uncertainty on the first implication but I don't see how those contradict the second one.
I would think there's enough of a difference between youmu and her ghost that they shouldn't be implicated.
It's like if you want to search for konpaku_youmu, chances are you won't want to look at the images of her spirit self by itself.
I'm okay with the second one though. It makes perfect sense.
I think the second one is just a quickly found example of the fact that her ghost half can also personified to look like her. That could also be without it even appearing as a ghost in the picture.
konpaku_youmu_(ghost) chartags:2 2girls
So yeah, no to both really.
Anelaid said:
Isn't she not really a ghost and that her ghost half is just a spirit?I don't see why we can't just call it Myon like we used to, its what the Western fandom is familiar with and we are part of the Western fandom.
Although you are probably quite familiar with this topic.
myon is aliased to konpaku_youmu_(ghost). The ghost half needs differentiating from her human half for sure, the implication is inappropriate because Youmu appears frequently without her ghost half, and vice-versa. Also, not what we want to see when searching "ghost".
