Tag Implication: groin_kick -> kicking

Implicating groin_kick -> kicking.

Reason: The former involved the latter.

You mean groin_kick, right?

Arrei said:
You mean groin_kick, right?

No idea how I made that typo, fixed.

groin_kick shows grabbing and stomping, as well as before and after the attack. Its usage is more or less a catch-all for groin attacks, not just kicks, so -1 to the implication.

It may be better to generalize the tag into groin_attack.

Hillside_Moose said:
groin_kick shows grabbing and stomping, as well as before and after the attack. Its usage is more or less a catch-all for groin attacks, not just kicks, so -1 to the implication.

It may be better to generalize the tag into groin_attack.

We could separate the two, use groin kick for kicking and groin attack for other forms of groin punishment.

That seems excessive. Groin Attack + Kick should be more than enough.

On a similar note, is there really a need for Cunt Punt? Groin is a term that technically covers both types.

If nothing else, a separation between genders is enough.

As for tagging, we go into specificity for everything else, and this is more deserving of specificity than other things, methinks.

Rampardos said:
On a similar note, is there really a need for Cunt Punt? Groin is a term that technically covers both types.

I would suggest aliasing that one to groin_attack.

I think it would be fine retaining cunt_punt or a similar tag that would help distinguish between the genders (it would probably be fine implicating whatever that tag is to groin_attack). groin_attack is going to be a predominately male thing, but there should be a way to distinguish whether it is a male or a female on the receiving end of the attack.

I would like to note though, if someone tries to bring up using groin_attack male or groin_attack -male to try and do that distinguishing, you're obviously not thinking very hard about this and shouldn't say anything.

Gender distinction is okay I guess, but I would sure love to see the name changed. Just not sure to what.

Kind of a lame solution, but what if it was made into groin_attack_(male) / groin_attack_(female)?

Edit: Also, I think groin_injury is a better name, considering it better covers all types of situations.

Except the groin_injury terminology wouldn't cover situations before the attack, not to mention some genius will suggest an implication to injury at some point despite no visible injury to the groin itself.

With 70 groin_kick vs. 8 cunt_punt, it's fair to say that male examples are going to be dominant, so we should give female examples a specific tag rather than both getting one. I agree that cunt_punt is very crude though; female_groin_attack is probably the best tag, even if it's cumbersome.

That's mostly an insignificant technicality, and more intuitively including accidents I think is more important. Also, someone suggesting an implication really isn't very damaging at all, since it would have to be approved, anyway.

groin_attack/injury with the qualification (female) would also be better due to a more convenient listing, being next to the tag for the male version.