Tag Implications: pantyshot_(*) -> pantyshot, *

create implication pantyshot_(standing) -> pantyshot
create implication pantyshot_(standing) -> standing
create implication pantyshot_(lying) -> pantyshot
create implication pantyshot_(lying) -> lying
create implication pantyshot_(squatting) -> pantyshot
create implication pantyshot_(squatting) -> squatting
create implication pantyshot_(kneeling) -> pantyshot
create implication pantyshot_(kneeling) -> kneeling

Reason: Subsets.

And these implications are already in place, listed for completeness:
pantyshot_(sitting) -> pantyshot
pantyshot_(sitting) -> sitting

Previous related discussions:
forum #78699
forum #80196

As I've said in one of those threads, we should decide whether we really want to keep these tags before creating any new implications. So it's probably best to revive forum #78699.

Well for now I'm doing the implications. Removing the tags later will be easier if the implications are already in place because then we'll know they all have pantyshot + position in place.