I was asking a question and I'm being a negative person for asking but there are no nudity in that picture that is rated "Questionable" like crap but there are a few of those non-inappropriate pictures mislabelled as "Questionable" with no nudity just like some of those non-inappropriate pictures in that website "Zerochan" got mislabelled as "Ecchi"
I’m not the one who downvoted, but it could be because the comments are seen as repetitive. It’s not really necessary to leave a comment on every misrated post.
Also, I don’t think we should be pinging users over tagging mistakes from 11 years ago. Not only is it possible the user improved over time, it also doesn’t take into account whether the standards have changed. In this case, it’s still a mistake since it probably wouldn’t have qualified for Q even 11 years ago, but what if it’s something more borderline next time?
I’m not the one who downvoted, but it could be because the comments are seen as repetitive. It’s not really necessary to leave a comment on every misrated post.
Also, I don’t think we should be pinging users over tagging mistakes from 11 years ago. Not only is it possible the user improved over time, it also doesn’t take into account whether the standards have changed. In this case, it’s still a mistake since it probably wouldn’t have qualified for Q even 11 years ago, but what if it’s something more borderline next time?
That "Questionable" rating only applies to topless women of all kind but not for "Bra" "Bikini" and "Underwear" of all kind
