Danbooru
Login Posts Comments Notes Artists Tags Pools Wiki Forum More »
Listing Upload Hot Changes Help

Search

  • Help
guro
scat
furry -rating:g

Artist

  • ? takeuchi takashi 2.0k

Copyrights

  • ? fate (series) 357k
  • ? ↳ fate/grand order 266k

Characters

  • ? artoria pendragon (fate) 41k
  • ? ↳ saber alter 6.8k
  • ? ↳ saber alter (final ascension) 362

General

  • ? 1girl 6.8M
  • ? ahoge 753k
  • ? black thighhighs 420k
  • ? blonde hair 1.8M
  • ? blush 3.3M
  • ? breasts 3.9M
  • ? dark persona 12k
  • ? elbow gloves 340k
  • ? gloves 1.6M
  • ? gothic lolita 19k
  • ? high heels 230k
  • ? lolita fashion 34k
  • ? nipples 929k
  • ? nude 559k
  • ? open mouth 2.7M
  • ? sitting 1.1M
  • ? small breasts 564k
  • ? snow 45k
  • ? solo 5.7M
  • ? thighhighs 1.3M
  • ? yellow eyes 806k

Meta

  • ? bad id 1.3M
  • ? ↳ bad pixiv id 997k
  • ? third-party edit 25k
  • ? ↳ nude filter 2.2k

Information

  • ID: 2342194
  • Uploader: HNTI »
  • Date: over 9 years ago
  • Size: 191 KB .jpg (539x758) »
  • Source: pixiv.net/artworks/56542583 »
  • Rating: Questionable
  • Score: 40
  • Favorites: 41
  • Status: Deleted

Options

  • Resize to window
  • Find similar
  • Download

History

  • Tags
  • Pools
  • Notes
  • Moderation
  • Commentary

This post was deleted for the following reason:

Unapproved in three days after returning to moderation queue (over 9 years ago)
This post belongs to a parent (learn more) « hide
post #2132776
artoria pendragon and saber alter (fate and 1 more) drawn by takeuchi_takashi
  • ‹ prev Search: takeuchi_takashi status:deleted next ›
  • Comments
  • Recommended
  • Loading...

    Miene
    over 9 years ago
    [hidden]

    A non-trivial nude filter warrants a more descriptive deletion flag, no?

    1 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    OOZ662
    over 9 years ago
    [hidden]

    Miene said:

    A non-trivial nude filter warrants a more descriptive deletion flag, no?

    Apparently it was decided they should be outright banned again, so not really.

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    user 460797
    over 9 years ago
    [hidden]

    OOZ662 said:

    Apparently it was decided they should be outright banned again, so not really.

    Apparently?
    I thought Hillside Moose was pretty clear in this thread to not approve every nude filter^^?

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    OOZ662
    over 9 years ago
    [hidden]

    Provence said:

    Apparently?
    I thought Hillside Moose was pretty clear in this thread to not approve every nude filter^^?

    It was a confusing time. The two mods that later became admins stated opposite opinions, then later one just kinda slotted into the rulebook. Honestly, I don't really care about the issue personally, the whole thing was just a bit muddy.

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    user 460797
    over 9 years ago
    [hidden]

    OOZ662 said:

    It was a confusing time. The two mods that later became admins stated opposite opinions, then later one just kinda slotted into the rulebook. Honestly, I don't really care about the issue personally, the whole thing was just a bit muddy.

    Well, at the end is was pretty clear, though. If one steps in, and the other doesn't complain, then this has to be considered concensus...even though it is also detrimental to me^^.

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Terms / Privacy / Upgrade / Contact /