Poor Compression is one of the examples listed for flagging a post.
Wrong. http://danbooru.donmai.us/static/terms_of_service Well, not wrong, but your answer doesn't get along with the TOS which should be treated as "Da rules" according to this topic (you even say so in your own posts^^)
Well, better pull the topic out again. These TOS don't seem to be recognized by the flaggers when they are rules.
Wrong. http://danbooru.donmai.us/static/terms_of_service Well, not wrong, but your answer doesn't get along with the TOS which should be treated as "Da rules" according to this topic (you even say so in your own posts^^)
"Poor Compression" is listed as one of the reasons given for flagging a post when you click the Flag button, that's all I said. Though it's also listed in the ToS under restricted content with a technicality about having "no better version available." I think compression looks ugly enough to where I skip over most Twitter uploads when approving, but that's just me.
"Poor Compression" is listed as one of the reasons given for flagging a post when you click the Flag button, that's all I said. Though it's also listed in the ToS under restricted content with a technicality about having "no better version available." I think compression looks ugly enough to where I skip over most Twitter uploads when approving, but that's just me.
Well, I've make a post in the forum about the TOS now, since the rules here aren't the best (the nude filter part is still in the TOS :o) And I think you're right. In fact, EB said that to me as well after I brougt this topic via DM to him. Your last sentence, because it would be in some way unfair to the approvers to approve such posts then^^. But this doesn't explain the difference from the flag window and the TOS because in this case, they seem to contradict each other