Danbooru
Login Posts Comments Notes Artists Tags Pools Wiki Forum More »
Listing Upload Hot Changes Help

Search

  • Help
guro
scat
furry -rating:g

Artist

  • ? ikuchan kaoru 1.3k

Copyrights

  • ? pokemon 310k
  • ? ↳ pokemon (anime) 22k

Character

  • ? delia ketchum 396

General

  • ? 1girl 6.8M
  • ? :p 44k
  • ? ahoge 747k
  • ? ass 659k
  • ? blush 3.3M
  • ? brown eyes 923k
  • ? brown hair 1.7M
  • ? curvy 54k
  • ? flying sweatdrops 100k
  • ? from behind 265k
  • ? huge ass 24k
  • ? long hair 4.9M
  • ? looking at viewer 3.8M
  • ? looking back 308k
  • ? mature female 39k
  • ? pantylines 4.7k
  • ? pencil skirt 44k
  • ? ponytail 784k
  • ? profile 147k
  • ? skirt 1.7M
  • ? solo 5.6M
  • ? tongue 437k
  • ? tongue out 325k
  • ? wide hips 44k

Meta

  • ? bad id 1.3M
  • ? ↳ bad pixiv id 995k
  • ? highres 6.2M
  • ? ↳ absurdres 2.2M
  • ? translation request 625k

Information

  • ID: 2471586
  • Uploader: Apollyon »
  • Date: almost 9 years ago
  • Approver: Hillside Moose »
  • Size: 2.36 MB .jpg (2433x3507) »
  • Source: pixiv.net/artworks/58368014 »
  • Rating: Sensitive
  • Score: 81
  • Favorites: 154
  • Status: Active

Options

  • Resize to window
  • View smaller
  • View original
  • Find similar
  • Download

History

  • Tags
  • Pools
  • Notes
  • Moderation
  • Commentary
Resized to 34% of original (view original)
delia ketchum (pokemon) drawn by ikuchan_kaoru
  • « ‹ prev Pool: Expert Shading next › »
  • Comments
  • Recommended
  • Loading...

    Snafu01
    almost 9 years ago
    [hidden]

    Am I the only one who thinks it looks like she has a pair of breasts for ass cheeks?

    -1 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Selvokaz
    almost 9 years ago
    [hidden]

    I'm more concerned with how the face doesn't match the level of detail and skill as the ass itself lol..

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Evertide
    almost 9 years ago
    [hidden]

    Selvokaz said:

    I'm more concerned with how the face doesn't match the level of detail and skill as the ass itself lol..

    You know what they say: Eyes are up there, but party's down there.

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    OOZ662
    almost 9 years ago
    [hidden]

    Snafu01 said:

    Am I the only one who thinks it looks like she has a pair of breasts for ass cheeks?

    I guess they're supposed to be panty lines, but she needs to stop trying to wear Kasumi's underwear.

    1 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Apollyon
    almost 9 years ago
    [hidden]

    I doubt that some large assets being prominently on display alone make an image worth flagging, so I'm going to ask something of @Snafu01, @Selvokaz, and @OOZ662 here.

    When you made those comments, did you believe this post actually needed to be flagged, whatever the reason is?

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    OOZ662
    almost 9 years ago
    [hidden]

    I wouldn't flag it myself, but I wouldn't approve it either. I recognize other people have different tastes than I do and that I'm usually a very harsh critic on non-comic images. While a bit unrealistic (if your butt's hanging that far out of the bottom of "granny panties" like these seem to be, then those seams are gonna explode) and a little weirdly muscular in the shoulders, it isn't something worth fighting over if someone else sees fit to approve it.

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Selvokaz
    almost 9 years ago
    [hidden]

    Apollyon said:

    I doubt that some large assets being prominently on display alone make an image worth flagging, so I'm going to ask something of @Snafu01, @Selvokaz, and @OOZ662 here.

    When you made those comments, did you believe this post actually needed to be flagged, whatever the reason is?

    Not really.. someone is going to like something about this image myself included, I mean it's clear where the focus of the piece is suppose to be. The face isn't bad it just isn't as awesome as her bottom. :)

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    user 460797
    almost 9 years ago
    [hidden]

    Apollyon said:

    You bring this up again after having it discussed via a DM?
    Let me say you this: I thought that the first comment here (i thought I told you that) is critisizing it. Maybe in an ambigious way, you're right. A flag should only be spoken if the flagger himself thinks that there is a problem, too (here with the ass in particular which bulges out too much). So let an approver decide this in the end. If they don't think that it passes the check: Not approve. If they think it is worth staying here: Approve.

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Apollyon
    almost 9 years ago
    [hidden]

    Provence said:

    You bring this up again after having it discussed via a DM?

    I asked about what the commenters actually thought, not your interpretations. And I didn't ask you anything here, so you didn't need to respond.

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Snafu01
    almost 9 years ago
    [hidden]

    Apollyon said:

    I doubt that some large assets being prominently on display alone make an image worth flagging, so I'm going to ask something of @Snafu01, @Selvokaz, and @OOZ662 here.

    When you made those comments, did you believe this post actually needed to be flagged, whatever the reason is?

    I simply asked a question. No more, no less. Not sure what you mean by "flagged", though I apparently forgot to click "no bump". I'll apologize for that.

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    OOZ662
    almost 9 years ago
    [hidden]

    @Snafu01 said:

    I simply asked a question. No more, no less. Not sure what you mean by "flagged", though I apparently forgot to click "no bump". I'll apologize for that.

    To flag a post is to send (or return) it to the 3-day approval queue. If none of the approvers then re-approve it, it gets deleted. Apollyon was basically asking you if you felt the post should be deleted assuming your comment was posted after the image was flagged, though I don't think it was yet.

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Snafu01
    almost 9 years ago
    [hidden]

    OOZ662 said:

    @Snafu01 said:

    To flag a post is to send (or return) it to the 3-day approval queue. If none of the approvers then re-approve it, it gets deleted. Apollyon was basically asking you if you felt the post should be deleted assuming your comment was posted after the image was flagged, though I don't think it was yet.

    Thank you, I get it now. Didn't think it was necessarily bad enough to be deleted, just looked odd to me.

    0 Reply
    • Copy ID
    • Copy Link
    Terms / Privacy / Upgrade / Contact /