Looks like the artist wanted to try out one other artist's artstyle (which also sometimes shows overexaggerated anatomy).

The flags lately are turning into a plea for the janitors to come up with the flag reason. "Something is wrong here...fill in the blank for me"

sweetpeɐ said:

The flags lately are turning into a plea for the janitors to come up with the flag reason. "Something is wrong here...fill in the blank for me"

@sweetpeɐ
And is this really a problem?
I guess "quality check" or "poor quality" is not different as this.
Besides, the flagger mentioned the hips. That is enough, although it could be more refined.

Provence said:

@sweetpeɐ
And is this really a problem?
I guess "quality check" or "poor quality" is not different as this.
Besides, the flagger mentioned the hips. That is enough, although it could be more refined.

I suppose it's not a problem, I was really reflecting on what I have observed not judging it. I really don't think it would be a bad thing if there were more flags that are just "quality check" because janitors are smart enough to intuit the hard-at-times-to-explain problem with a picture, but people seem reluctant to flag and treat the flag reason as a casus belli that they need to make a defensible argument for rather than something much less serious, probably because of the anger directed at flaggers. I think flags are a good and positive thing, even when posts are re-approved because they weed out rot and decay.

I mean it is a problem in that it's kind of up to the reporter to mention the problem.

You shouldn't just be allowed to tag something and tell them "Here just find something wrong". No, if you don't know what's wrong then don't report it.

TheMuffinMan said:

I mean it is a problem in that it's kind of up to the reporter to mention the problem.

You shouldn't just be allowed to tag something and tell them "Here just find something wrong". No, if you don't know what's wrong then don't report it.

The flagger mentioned the waist.