NarakuniYokoso said: someone please explain whats wrong with this one?
It's frowned upon for users to upload their own art. This is Danbooru, not DeviantArt.
Additionally, the lines are choppy, the face looks like a trace, the lighting angles aren't right, the two-tone shading is jarring, and the hair looks like a single sheet of plastic.
Not saying it looks horrible, but we strive for better.
hungkok2007 said: It looks to me like Illustrator (vector) rather than PhotoShop (raster?), but pretty well done for my tastes. ^_^ shrug
I won't record you this time because I'm so nice, but this is a textbook example of a comment of negative worth that would ordinarily result in punishment. It's:
1. Late 2. Answers questions that weren't stated or implied 3. Uses stupid capitalisation AND reveals your utter lack of experience in the domain you chose to talk about, despite it already being off-topic as per 2. 4. Tops it all off with a completely useless, childish and out of place double emoticon
sgcdonmai said: It's frowned upon for users to upload their own art. This is Danbooru, not DeviantArt.
Additionally, the lines are choppy, the face looks like a trace, the lighting angles aren't right, the two-tone shading is jarring, and the hair looks like a single sheet of plastic.
Not saying it looks horrible, but we strive for better.
I personally find it unfortunate that you blast some guy for uploading his own rather decent work and proceed to nitpick it apart when anatomically horrid and hastily scribbled garbage like post #396492 and post #442340 gets approved without so much as a second thought.
First of all, I'm not a mod, so the burden of approval is not on my shoulders. Second, those two images were uploaded by people with Contributor status, which (IIRC) gives everything they upload automatic approval.
Yeah would have gone a lot smoother if you pretended you weren't the artist. At least thats what I notice people have been doing. But maybe people that seem to only upload one artist from deviantart is just a coincidence....
葉月 said: I won't record you this time because I'm so nice, but this is a textbook example of a comment of negative worth that would ordinarily result in punishment. It's:
1. Late
Late relative to what? This is completely unreasonable for a mod to complain about.
2. Answers questions that weren't stated or implied
Who said I was answering any questions?
3. Uses stupid capitalisation
Wrong. That's ignorant, not stupid. If you as a mod cannot distinguish, you should not be a mod. Or you should change your damn medication.
Plus in many countries of the world, your spelling of capitalization would be considered incorrect. If you want to teach respect, show it yourself.
4. Tops it all off with a completely useless, childish and out of place double emoticon
Pot. Kettle. Black. If you're going to ban me because YOU went over the top, I want my refund.
Dr_Fine_Rolo said: Record isn't a ban, it's called karma in a lot of other systems.
I wasn't referring to the record of my first comment; rather, I was anticipating his reaction to my second comment.
This looks like someone poorly vectored something from the early 80s.
Yeah, very possible. But it also looks like something done up for a Flash-based Web cartoon, like WhirlyGirl or something. That's why I I didn't slam it.
hungkok2007 said: I wasn't referring to the record of my first comment; rather, I was anticipating his reaction to my second comment.
Oh, I see, so you're basically provoking me, hoping that your preemptive accusations of me blowing my top would protect you? That's a dangerous game you're playing there. I can easily ban you AND keep my cool, want a demonstration?
