Why is this marked for bad proportions, while the child isn't? The only difference is pasties, and the child is approved. It should be allowed or the child should be unapproved too. Yes, the eyes are a little wonky but that's just more reason to unapprove the child as well.

[deleted]

ppeeaann said:

Why is this marked for bad proportions, while the child isn't? The only difference is pasties, and the child is approved. It should be allowed or the child should be unapproved too. Yes, the eyes are a little wonky but that's just more reason to unapprove the child as well.

Probably because it was added by someone else and they didn't bother tagging the child to

WhatWillYouDoWithoutMeOp said:

Probably because it was added by someone else and they didn't bother tagging the child to

They actually did tag the child, at the same time, but added bad anatomy instead.

ppeeaann said:

Why is this marked for bad proportions, while the child isn't? The only difference is pasties, and the child is approved. It should be allowed or the child should be unapproved too. Yes, the eyes are a little wonky but that's just more reason to unapprove the child as well.

the child post was uploaded by unres user, they can post without going through queue. But I agree with that bad propotion, it looks mess.

Only just saw all these. Sorry if I came off as rude, I just like seeing the same standards applied. Thanks for clearing this up and the images out!!