American sexual mores are all mixed up; but in certain States, particularly down south they were historically way lower In 1880, the ages of consent were set at 10 or 12 in most states, with the exception of Delaware where it was 7. * --- note to self: avoid Delaware --- reason I remember this is because fairly recently, in part of the American Media's crusade to blame Donald Trump for everything happening since America began, one of his officials [ a governor or something ] was accused of being a paedophile because he met his wife back in the Stone Age when she was about 14 and he was in his 20s.
Regardless if they exist are not, you should have a moral obligation to not fuck children.
I mean, if they don’t exist, no child is harmed or abused in making it. If anything the existence of loli and shota art gives less reason for “the real deal” to be made. There’s also a huge difference between someone who looks at art of and sexually appreciates the fantasy of a thing, and someone who has no respect for the health, safety, mental wellbeing, and dignity of a real, living, breathing human. The latter would probably find an excuse to be a criminal whether that art exists or not.
People on this site will scream in terror at a character being drawn as if they weren't white or Japanese, but see no qualms whatsoever about jacking off to kids.
People on this site will scream in terror at a character being drawn as if they weren't white or Japanese, but see no qualms whatsoever about jacking off to kids.
There is also a large amount of Ryona, Guro, and Zoophilia art on this site. Not much difference. Fantasy is fantasy, and kept as a fantasy there’s nothing wrong with it. If anything it’s more healthy to have that mindset than to find something fictional arousing and think that says something about your actual morals.
People on this site will scream in terror at a character being drawn as if they weren't white or Japanese, but see no qualms whatsoever about jacking off to kids.
Maybe we should not see anything either. Killing people or enjoying entertainment featuring fictional characters being killed has the same effect as jacking off to them (nothing). Stay on watching Paw Patrol and whatever you do, do not read The Bible. It features sex, bestiality, incest, murder, genocide from a "loving" revengeful god. It's not proper to make those poor fictional characters suffer more than a loli on a hentai product.
I mean, if they don’t exist, no child is harmed or abused in making it. If anything the existence of loli and shota art gives less reason for “the real deal” to be made. There’s also a huge difference between someone who looks at art of and sexually appreciates the fantasy of a thing, and someone who has no respect for the health, safety, mental wellbeing, and dignity of a real, living, breathing human. The latter would be a criminal whether that art exists or not.
Maybe we should not see anything either. Killing people or enjoying entertainment featuring fictional characters being killed has the same effect as jacking off to them (nothing). Stay on watching Paw Patrol and whatever you do, do not read The Bible. It features sex, bestiality, incest, murder, genocide from a "loving" revengeful god. It's not proper to make those poor fictional characters suffer more than a loli on a hentai product.
My recommendation is next time you talk like that, make sure you don't sexualize 15 year olds. People with twisted morals under violent god teachings could see your uploads and believe you also fuck with animals.
My recommendation is next time you talk like that, make sure you don't sexualize 15 year olds. People with twisted morals under violent god teachings could see your uploads and believe you also fuck with animals.
I just realized the heat of that burn when I looked who uploaded that image
My recommendation is next time you talk like that, make sure you don't sexualize 15 year olds. People with twisted morals under violent god teachings could see your uploads and believe you also fuck with animals.
"N-No wait! You're the wrong one here, because you said the F-word 20 years ago!" 🤓🤓🤓
Blud cannot think of anything that justifies his love for children other than a copout
Imagine uploading and favoriting sexualized images of underage characters and characters with the appearance of being underage and still having the confidence to call someone else a pedo for defending fictional content and claim no correlation when your own hypocrisy is pointed out.
Oh wow you edited it and made it worse. Bruh, you uploaded that Kyouka post after this one.
Forget what I said before, imagine uploading this stupid meme post, then uploading a sexualized 15 year old, and then jumping onto a moral high horse to criticize other people's taste in fictional characters. Calling you a clown is an insult to the circus.
Imagine uploading and favoriting sexualized images of underage characters and characters with the appearance of being underage and still having the confidence to call someone else a pedo for defending fictional content and claim no correlation when your own hypocrisy is pointed out.
Oh wow you edited it and made it worse. Bruh, you uploaded that Kyouka post after this one.
Forget what I said before, imagine uploading this stupid meme post, then uploading a sexualized 15 year old, and then jumping onto a moral high horse to criticize other people's taste in fictional characters. Calling you a clown is an insult to the circus.
The fact that you did put two and two together and still failed make it out as obvious satire will never not be the funniest shit to me.
You claim to defend the art of "Lolicon" yet you've blinded yourself to the point where everything is perceived as a threat. Doesn't mean that's a bad thing especially with the Twitter Squad and their bias against eastern media.
The fact that you did put two and two together and still failed make it out as obvious satire will never not be the funniest shit to me.
You claim to defend the art of "Lolicon" yet you've blinded yourself to the point where everything is perceived as a threat. Doesn't mean that's a bad thing especially with the Twitter Squad and their bias against eastern media.
I didn't claim to be doing that, and nothing you've said works as satire.
I didn't claim to be doing that, and nothing you've said works as satire.
LeEpicMochi said:
The fact that you did put two and two together and still failed make it out as obvious satire will never not be the funniest shit to me.
You claim to defend the art of "Lolicon" yet you've blinded yourself to the point where everything is perceived as a threat. Doesn't mean that's a bad thing especially with the Twitter Squad and their bias against eastern media.
That’s not satire, that’s intentionally baiting an argument and trolling, and/or backpedaling after being genuine
Hey, this is Karumi/KaryoDares, the author of this stupid parody meme. Just wanted to let you know: this meme wasn't intended to be done to talk about age of consent in anime girls, I just liked it (the original, I mean), and drew Biten and her new friend Sanae as Goku and Vegeta. I honestly don't care about such a thing, but I find it funny (sometimes annoying) whenever someone brings up that topic with a 2D character. Most of this people forget that the real problem is out of the internet, where real groomers/pedos or real serial killers are. Please, enjoy fiction as it is; fiction, but NEVER cross the line with real people in situations that could be harmful. I enjoy some problematic fiction, and I'm pretty sure you also do. Both you and I know how to differentiate a real situation from a non-existent one, right?
