This post was deleted for the following reason:

Unapproved in three days ()
cirno (touhou) drawn by tenko_(gintenko)

Artist's commentary

  • Original
    •

    チルノの作ったかき氷♪

    何か思いついたので原稿休憩してカキカキ。カキ氷はやっぱりイチゴ味☆コメントの返事は四コマUPした時に書き込みます＞＜。すみません！まさかR-18Gなんてものがあるとは知らず・・・指摘ありがとうです＞＜。エロ制限だけかとおもってた・・orz

  • Comments
  • Recommended
    •
    Siotris
    [hidden]

    Nice concept (blending fairies and all). That has got to be a very painful death, I can just imagine cirno's lower body just ripping and getting tangled in the blades with intestines and muscle tissue just dangling down before getting shredded.

    When I saw the thumbnail. Depth bomb immediately came to mind.

    -Siotris

  • 0
  • Reply
    • JakeBob
    [hidden]

    kunangkuadrat said:
    -6? Wow, people must hate guro very much.

    Some people don't hate guro. Guro of a ice fairy which they think is made of ICE, though, is going to send some fans into shock. The privileged users just dropped their monocles in their tea, they're so shocked.

  • 2
  • Reply
    • SindriAndBale
    [hidden]

    JakeBob said:
    Some people don't hate guro. Guro of a ice fairy which they think is made of ICE, though, is going to send some fans into shock. The privileged users just dropped their monocles in their tea, they're so shocked.

    Why would people think she's made of ice anyway? If she were, she certainly would look more like a block of ice shaped like a person. Also, I don't mind guro, and in fact I quite enjoy it sometimes. But torture is wrong, mmmkay?

    ...And did anyone else think of the woodchipper scene in Fargo?

  • 0
  • Reply
    • JakeBob
    [hidden]

    SindriAndBale said:
    ...And did anyone else think of the woodchipper scene in Fargo?

    Holy fuck, I know that reference. That freaks me out more than the reference. That's the one where the big guy's feeding the corpse of his acquaintance into a woodchipper and is caught in the act, right? It's not too fresh in my memory, so that might be wrong...

  • 0
  • Reply
    • SindriAndBale
    [hidden]

    JakeBob said:
    Holy fuck, I know that reference. That freaks me out more than the reference. That's the one where the big guy's feeding the corpse of his acquaintance into a woodchipper and is caught in the act, right? It's not too fresh in my memory, so that might be wrong...

    Yep. He was forcing the leg into it and it wouldn't go down, which made me think of this.

  • 0
  • Reply
    • JakeBob
    [hidden]

    SindriAndBale said:
    Yep. He was forcing the leg into it and it wouldn't go down, which made me think of this.

    You know, it's the strangest thing. I haven't watched the entire movie, just sort of the end part when I was wondering what my parents were watching, and this was around three or four years ago. I'm pleased, shocked and slightly depressed that I actually remember that. Maybe it was just that effective a scene. Cause I remember vaguely that the guy gets shot in the leg trying to run across a frozen lake.

    Chaykon said:
    It's artifacted like fuck.
    Also not really a pinnacle of art quality.

    It doesn't appear "artifacted like fuck", unless I'm missing something, like a "high quality monitor" or something. I mean, yeah, there's some artifacting, but it can't affect the voting that much, since there's a "jpeg_artifact" tag on this site with active posts in it.

    I cannot, however, comment on the quality of the art. I'll let the janitors do that.

  • 0
  • Reply
    • Chaykon
    [hidden]

    JakeBob said:
    It doesn't appear "artifacted like fuck", unless I'm missing something, like a "high quality monitor" or something. I mean, yeah, there's some artifacting, but it can't affect the voting that much, since there's a "jpeg_artifact" tag on this site with active posts in it.

    Now I'm on 19" LCD, but it seems just as artifacted as 12 hours ago on a 15" CRT. Look at the fingers and Cirno. The picture went through horrible things to get at those 70 KB.

  • 0
  • Reply