I see. I meant no disrespect, that comment was also for your own sake as to not waste your time uploading/tagging only for them to be deleted I guess the AI-assisted tag would be more fitting, there was no way for anyone to know as you haven't sourced any posts properly either
Perhaps next time, you should stick to deviantart or such, instead of posting your AI-assisted work where it isn't wanted. Just because one site happens to have a loose definition of the word 'AI-assisted' or 'AI-generated' does not mean that the still debatably murky lines of AI-art and its boundaries are accepted everywhere. Also how about not insulting the community you want your art to be approved by next time, that might help your case more than calling Danbooru 'stupid'.
I wanted this work to remain exclusive to one community on Reddit, but the completely stupid Danbooru moderations forced me to publish it here.
tracynla said:
there was no way for anyone to know as you haven't sourced any posts properly either
Your reddit posts would be a valid source, you don't need to post to twitter. Nobody forced you to post. Currently, the source is just a filename, indicating you uploaded a file directly from your computer or phone. Having a source is a separate requirement from proving your work is not AI-generated, and a reddit post would suffice.
While posting WIPs and timelapses can help against AI allegations, I fail to see how this one WIP screenshot of a separate image proves no AI was used in this or any of your other posts. Also, as has been previously stated, one site having a bad definition of AI use does not mean we have to adopt it. For our purposes any use of AI, including tracing AI generations, is still using AI. Especially still leaving in significant errors. This is a definition that has been hotly debated and the current standard works well. If you don't like your images being tagged for AI use, simply do not use AI.
"AI-generated” spam tags on the part of the moderators
No moderator-level (or above) user has ever made a tag edit to one of your posts, I checked. The only instance was by NNTBot (a bot, hence the name) automatically adding your artist tag.
ZhKPiton said:
Which is fundamentally wrong and completely devalues my work.
It's clearly not wrong, plenty of AI red flags to be seen. And since you admit it completely devalues your work, maybe rethink how you create your work. Again, if you don't want your images to be tagged for significant use of AI, do not use AI.
Moderators have green usernames. The highest-ranked user in the tag history for that post is Diet Soda, an Approver. Approvers are a rank below Moderators and have purple names (as do Builders and Contributors).
ZhKPiton said:
The user edits tags > This means that he moderates the content on the site > This means that he is a moderator. Logical? Logical)
By that logic, every user, including you, is a moderator because any user can edit tags.
